Call for Paper submissions for Arm TechCon are reviewed by an independent Technical Program Committee. Members of the Technical Program Committee are selected based on their industry knowledge and represent companies and technologies across the entire Arm community. Differentiation and depth of proposals are of upmost importance when submitting as we expect several hundred submissions this year!
Below are some tips that have helped previous submissions be selected. Also, be sure to check out our sample submissions page to review previous Arm TechCon submissions that were selected.
The Arm TechCon Technical Program Committee of industry experts will review all submissions based on quality, relevance, impact, originality, and authenticity.
- Quality – Proposals should be well organized and easily understood. The abstract and summary are judged as indicators of what can be expected of the session.
- Relevance – The proposed session or panel should be highly relevant to the interests of the Arm TechCon audience in general and the track topic in particular. Example: real-world case studies.
- Impact – Sessions and Panels should contribute to the educational mission and technical nature of Arm TechCon. Can attendees act on the information presented? Submissions reporting on important results, methodologies, or case studies of special significance will be considered favorably.
- Originality – Reports on new design methodologies, case studies for innovative designs, or other novel results contribute to the Arm TechCon goal of providing a high-quality educational program for practicing engineers.
- Authenticity – While it is acceptable to use a product in a design case study or as a proof of concept for a design methodology, product promotion is not permitted in the technical sessions. Proposals with blatant commercial/marketing content will be rejected.